Observations on life; particularly spiritual

What does the New Testament say about Christians getting tattoos?

Dealing with debatable matters

In the previous article we saw that God communicates to us progressively through the Bible. So Old Testament (OT) verses need to be understood in view of the additional knowledge we have in the New Testament (NT). In doing this we can look for examples, warnings, encouragement and hope in the OT which are consistent with the messages given to churches in the NT. In the case of Leviticus 19:28, which prohibited the Jews having tattoos, the tests for a tattoo today could be: Is it consistent or inconsistent with being devoted to God? Is it linked to idolatry? Does it display the fruit of the Spirit or an act of the sinful nature? What is the motivation behind the tattoo?

Now we will look at how the teachings of the NT apply to this topic, which provides further insight into how we can apply the teaching of Scripture to our daily lives. The previous article stated that tattooing was not mentioned specifically in the NT. However, some people think the following verses could refer to tattoos. During the time of tribulation after true Christians are taken to heaven, the false prophet will force “all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom. Let those who have insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666” (Rev. 13:16-18TNIV). Also, when Christ returns to earth to put down His enemies and to set up His kingdom, “On His robe and on His thigh He has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.” (Rev. 19:16).

As the word translated “mark” (Strongs #5480) is a scratch or etching; something engraved or stamped it looks like it could be a literal mark on the skin. However, this is only an inference. The word translated “written” (Strong’s #1125) usually refers to something written in a book, scroll, or on a board. However, it may be symbolic not literal, like the sword out of His mouth (v.15). Obviously, there can be various views on the “mark” and the “writing”.

Debatable Matters

In a situation that is not sinful, whether to get a tattoo can be considered to be a debatable matter where Christians may have different opinions and convictions. These are secondary matters that are not essential to the Christian faith. The bible distinguishes between essentials and non-essentials in the Christian faith. The essentials or fundamentals or primary matters are things which all believers should agree on. They are the tests the Bible quotes for recognising false teachers and false ideas about things such as the person and work of Christ; the good news of salvation “by grace … through faith .. not by works” (Eph. 2:8-9); and the inspiration and authority of the Bible as God’s revelation to us.

Apart from such foundational truths, there are many other things in the bible that are not as clear and not as easily understood. These are non-essentials or secondary matters. Romans 14:1 – 15:7; 1 Corinthians 8 and 1 Corinthians 10:23-33 are key passages on this topic. In Romans 14:1 they are called “disputable matters” (Rom. 14:1TNIV) or “doubtful things” (NKJV), but as the Greek word used (Strongs #1261) means “discussion” or “debate”, I prefer to call them “debatable matters”. We can debate them, but shouldn’t dispute them. In these instances as the Bible allows for differences of opinion, we must also allow for differing opinions. Romans 14 addresses whether to eat food that has been offered to idols or whether one day was more sacred than another, which were issues in the first century AD around the Mediterranean. As Paul wrote, “The kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Rom. 14:17), what counts in God’s kingdom is not what we eat or drink, but lives characterised by practical righteousness, peace and joy.

The first example in this chapter concerns eating meat, “One person’s faith allows them to eat everything, but another person, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables.” (Rom. 14:2). When the book of Romans was written, many Gentile believers (those with no Jewish ancestry) had previously participated in pagan worship which included animal sacrifices to pagan gods. The animals that were sacrificed were usually sold as meat on the open market. So for those who had been saved out of this lifestyle the question became whether they should eat the meat sacrificed to these idols. By eating this meat, were they participating in the idolatry of pagans? This was a hard question for many. And desiring not to participate in idolatrous practices, many of these Gentile Christians became vegetarians. Only in that way could they assure themselves that they were not eating meat sacrificed to idols.

Paul says that the weak believer, with a strict conscience, ate only vegetables whereas the strong believer’s faith allowed them to eat this meat because they understood that the idols to which the meat had been offered were not gods at all – only pieces of wood, stone or metal. Therefore, as they ate the meat with that understanding, they were not participating in idolatry.

The second example has to do with observing special days as holy days, “Some consider one day more sacred than another; others consider every day alike” (Rom. 14:5). Those who had been saved out of a Jewish tradition of Sabbath days and festivals were apt to make a great deal out of those observances. However, others not coming from that background felt that every day was the Lord’s day, and that none were more special than others. This created problems in the early church. How were believers to live together who did not agree in every detail? How are we, today, to deal with other believers whose opinions differ from ours?

When I was young smoking, drinking alcohol, playing cards, movies and dancing were viewed as being sinful and taboo. In some circumstances this is true, but in others they may be debatable maters. The Bible gives principles that can help us determine God’s will in debatable matters. It is clear that these principles are important because of the numerous references to them in the New Testament.

God’s Honor

First, we are to honor God with our bodies (1 Cor. 6:19-20). When Paul said to “flee from sexual immorality”, he gave the following reason: “Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies” (1 Cor. 6:19-20). This means considering questions such as: Will it honor or dishonor God? Will His reputation be enhanced or harmed? Will God be exalted or disgraced? Will others think less of God, His church or of His word? Is the motive to draw attention to ourselves (1 Tim. 2:9)?

A related principle is that whatever we do should be done for the glory of God. When Paul discussed whether to eat meat that had been offered to idols he concluded, “So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31).

The Welfare of Others

Next we are to consider the welfare of others by putting the following three principles into practice.

Acting in love (Rom. 14:15)

With regard to debatable matters, Paul wrote, “‘I have the right to do anything,’ you say—but not everything is beneficial. ‘I have the right to do anything’—but not everything is constructive. No one should seek their own good, but the good of others” (1 Cor 10:23-24). In this area, although there is freedom of action, acting in love means that we consider the impact on others, particularly those whose conscience is weak or strict (1 Cor. 8:7). As a result of this we may need to modify our behaviour and not enjoy all the liberties that we could otherwise.

Acting in love means forbearing those with a stricter conscience, not insisting on doing what we want without considering the views of those around us, in order to build them up; “We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. We should all please our neighbors for their good, to build them up. For even Christ did not please Himself …” (Rom. 15:1-3a).


The practice of acceptance features in the passage in Romans, which begins with “accept those whose faith is weak” (Rom. 14:1). Those whose convictions allow them more freedom are to accept those with stricter consciences on debatable matters. Despite our differences of opinion with regard to debatable matters, believers should accept one another just as Christ has accepted us; “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God” (Rom. 15:7).

Our fellowship with one another shouldn’t depend on one’s viewpoint on such matters. As Christ died for all believers and they have been accepted as His children, we should accept them as well (Rom. 14:15). The call to the Christian is to accept every other believer without having to pass judgment on every opinion they hold. In other words, we are to allow for differing opinions, because differing opinions do not necessarily mean a differing faith.


With regard to debatable matters Paul wrote, “Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification” (Rom. 14:19). This means promoting peace and spiritual growth and determining whether the matter would help or hinder the harmony of believers.

Furthermore, the welfare of others involves avoiding the following three situations in debatable matters.

Don’t quarrel

Paul also wrote, “Accept those whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable (or debatable) matters” (Rom. 14:1). One way of accepting other believers is to not engage in disputes about their strict views and not force our convictions on them (Rom 14:22). We can share our opinion, but it is important to give others space to grow and to allow for the possibility that we may be wrong.

Don’t judge

Those with a strong conscience shouldn’t despise those with a strict conscience; “The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not” (Rom. 14:3a). On the other hand, those with a strict conscience are not to judge others as being sinners; “the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted that person” (Rom. 14:3b).

As far as our service goes as the Lord’s servants we are all accountable to Him, not to each other (Rom. 14:4, 10-13). This means respecting each other’s opinion as we can have differing views on what pleases the Lord (1 Th. 4:1). We are to allow for differing conclusions of honest believers seeking the mind of Christ, without criticism, without contempt, and without judgment (Rom. 14:10). Don’t judge one another critically to put others down (Rom. 14:13). React with love not criticism. Remember, God has accepted them. He is the judge in these matters, not us.

Note that these verses are dealing with debatable matters. We can certainly make judgements about matters that involve the fundamentals of the faith and sinful behaviour.

Don’t hinder spiritual growth

There are many references to not stumbling a weaker believer (Rom. 14:13, 15, 20-21; 1 Cor. 8:9-13; 1 Cor. 10:32-33). This means refraining from doing something that is not forbidden in Scripture if it hinders the spiritual progress of those with a strict conscience, by causing them to act against their conscience. Otherwise, both parties sin.

Don’t let debatable matters destroy the work of God. Paul even extends this principle to unbelievers because he wanted them to accept Christ as their Savior; “Do not cause anyone to stumble, whether Jews, Greeks or the church of God—even as I try to please everyone in every way. For I am not seeking my own good but the good of many, so that they may be saved” (1 Cor 10:32-33). It’s loving and unselfish to think of others above ourselves (Rom. 14:15; 15:1-2).

Order in the Church

When he was addressing disorder in the meetings of the church in Corinth, Paul wrote; “For God is not a God of disorder but of peace—as in all the congregations of the Lord’s people” and “everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way” (1 Cor. 14:33; 40). In this situation, Paul imposed some boundaries to ensure there was order instead of disorder.

Some debatable matters can affect the unity or functioning of the local church. Because the local church is to operate in an orderly way, in the case of debatable matters that directly affect the unity or functioning of the local church, there should be boundaries on what is taught and practised. In these situations, what is taught and practised within the church needs to be consistent and it will not always match everyone’s opinion because after all, we can have various opinions on these topics.


As tattoos are permanent, consider whether we and our family will still want or regret a tattoo in many years time. Also, because images affect our thoughts, any tattoo or image that we focus on should be true, honourable, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent and praiseworthy and not obscene (Eph. 5:4; Phil. 4:8). For example, it could symbolise a Biblical truth which benefits our relationship with Christ.

Finally, our body is like an instrument or tool that can be used for good or sinful purposes (Rom. 6:13). The important question is whether we are giving our bodies to God, not whether we have a tattoo or not (Rom. 12:1).

Lessons For Us

When considering tattoos and other debatable matters such as food, drink, clothes, standards of living and entertainments, we can ask the following questions: Will it honor or dishonor God? Are we acting in love?

Are we accepting one another regardless of their views on matters of secondary importance? Will it help or hinder the harmony of believers? Are we judging believers on matters of secondary importance? Will it hinder the spiritual progress of a weaker believer? Will it promote order or disorder in the local church?

Let’s apply these NT principles to the debateable matters in our daily lives.

Written, August 2009

See the other articles in this series:
What does the Old Testament say about Christians getting tattoos?
What does the Bible say about Christians getting tattoos?
What does the Bible say about Christians getting vaccinations?

14 responses

  1. Ashley

    Even if they still have pagan/demonic roots it is OK? Wouldn’t that be a no?


    June 28, 2013 at 10:59 am

    • Thanks Ashley. Can you give an example of what you mean by “pagan/demonic roots”? The names of the days of the week have “pagan/demonic roots”, but are no longer linked to pagan gods. Maybe a better question is: “Do they have pagan/demonic associations now?”


      June 28, 2013 at 11:17 am

    • Pagan, yes. Demonic, no. Pagans don’t believe in the Christian god or demons/Satan.


      August 18, 2014 at 4:42 am

  2. Pagans for the most part don’t believe in the Christian god or demonic forces. Calling something “Pagan/demonic” to describe something like a day of the week is archaic.


    August 18, 2014 at 4:44 am

    • Thanks for the comment. The topic being discussed is whether the names of the days of the weeks have “pagan/demonic roots” or not. We are looking at their etymology, not their current usage.
      The Greeks named the days of the week after the sun, the moon and the five known planets (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn). The Romans and others followed this pattern as did most Latin-based languages. The modern English names of these days are: Sunday after the sun, Monday after the moon, and Tuesday to Friday after the Norse versions of Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus, and Saturday after Saturn.
      Each day name was associated with an astronomical body and a pagan god. These celestial objects were worshipped as part of their pantheon of gods. For example, Mars was the god of war, Mercury the god of commerce, Jupiter the god who created thunder and lightning, Venus the goddess of love and fertility, and Saturn the god of agriculture. For Tuesday to Friday, Anglo-Saxon or Nordic gods (Tiw, Woden, Thor and Frigg) replaced the Roman gods. The sun and moon were also worshipped as gods.
      The Bible says “The sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God” (1 Cor. 10:20NIV). The Greek word translated “pagans” (Strongs #1484) means “foreign nations or people not worshipping the true God”. As the gods mentioned above are not the true God of the Bible, they are pagan gods. The Bible says that worshipping such a pagan god is equivalent to worshipping a demon. It seems as though demons use idolatry to control unbelievers. So those who are involved with idolatry of any kind are involved with demons and are influenced by demons.
      Therefore the worship of these gods is both pagan and demonic and the names of the days of the week have pagan/demonic roots.
      By the way, this doesn’t mean that the names of the days of the week have any pagan or demonic associations today.


      September 12, 2014 at 6:38 am

  3. cabrine

    I have decided to get a tatto of a cross. Thanks for the the clarity.


    March 30, 2016 at 1:49 am

  4. Brian Culver

    I use our money as an example. It all belongs to God. I in good conscience can not give money to a man that uses God’s money to put satanic images on the next customer that comes in. God is holy and we are to be holy. God is righteous and we are to be righteous. We need to teach holiness of God in the churches again. Instead many churches entertain the members with rock and roll. Youth groups don’t teach the Bible any more. They play in church and then 80% of those kids leave church when they graduate. Never got saved and never taught that without repentance there is no salvation.


    February 6, 2017 at 11:19 pm

    • Michael

      Good word 🙂


      June 11, 2018 at 9:03 pm

    • Cheryl

      Amen Brian Culver!!


      July 28, 2018 at 1:53 am

  5. Engela

    I am a Christian and a tattoo artist. Right from the start I have made it very clear that I will not tattoo any satanic/demonic images on anybody. If a person walks into my shop with such a request, I will advise him to go to another tattoo artist, so Brian Culver, if you do not want to get a tattoo that is just fine, but please do not think that all tattoo artists are the same.


    March 17, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    • Joseline B

      You are amazing! Just as I was reading this I was wondering if such artist existed. Now I would like to get a tattoo done by you. I have many ideas of my own 🙂


      January 3, 2019 at 9:07 pm

  6. Jeffrey G Mikres

    1 Cor 3:16-17 says your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit. NKJV says if you defile your temple UR in trouble. Imagine a beautiful nice white temple and someone comes along and starts painting it, defiling it.


    October 17, 2017 at 3:03 am

    • Cheryl

      That is like painting graffiti on God’s temple! Amen Jeffery!! I don’t care what you call Christian markings, most people say they are Christian and don’t understand what being a Christian means, if God wants us to have marks then He will put on His bodies what He wants them to be marked with. We don’t belong to ourselves and do not have the right to do as we please.


      July 28, 2018 at 2:01 am

  7. Gustavo Del Cid

    That’s why this article was written. You can’t expect Christians to believe the way you do. With all due respect. Teach the ways of Christ instead of judging who ever decides to get a tattoo. Churches have become more judgemental than teaching the ways of Christ, yeah depending on the persons prospective and maturity in Christ. We are the temple of the Holy Spirit, but it does not only apply to tattoos, it applies to our every day life. What we consume, how we maintain ourselves, what we watch in our time of solitude, and how we treat others. If a certain action makes a new believer stumble then we are in trouble but meanwhile it doesn’t force anyone into your thought. Teach with the word not with your opinion. So many youth like myself have ran from the church because of a large debate on what you can’t do anymore, the word works in teens when you teach it and pray for God to work in that young life. Yes God is a God of truth and justice. But he also is a God who loves, which is one of the biggest issues in our church. The next person that has a tattoo that walks into a church most likely will get judged the second they walk through the doors. We are the body of Christ. We should act upon it instead of stating your opinion. The article is well explained. But it’s up to one to take action on what really matters here. What are you willing to do for Christ?


    September 1, 2018 at 2:35 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s